Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:36:30 +0000
fix issue with WE+ bit becoming unset, fix pagefault:not-mapped-in logic
- The WE+ (page write enable) bit was becoming unset when the Page Status bits were being set.
A stupid mistake in an AND expression was unsetting the write-enable, thus making S4TEST 12,2 and 12,3 fail spectacularly.
- Pagefaults were not being generated correctly for pages which were not mapped in. Even Supervisor code accessing unmapped pages should get a PF.
philpem@0 | 1 | From private email, dated 2010-Nov-26, 20:43 GMT: |
philpem@0 | 2 | |
philpem@0 | 3 | From: Karl Stenerud <kstenerud@gmail.com> |
philpem@0 | 4 | Subject: Re: Musashi 68k emulator |
philpem@0 | 5 | |
philpem@0 | 6 | On 2010-11-26, at 12:36 PM, Philip Pemberton wrote: |
philpem@0 | 7 | |
philpem@0 | 8 | > > I do have one question, though more related to licensing than the core itself... |
philpem@0 | 9 | > > |
philpem@0 | 10 | > > I was planning to release my emulator under an open-source licence, probably the GPL or something along those lines (the worst case scenario IMO would be someone adding a ton of nice features then refusing to release the source). |
philpem@0 | 11 | > > |
philpem@0 | 12 | > > The "non-commercial use only" restriction in the Musashi license would seem to be at odds with the GPL, and would make it somewhat more difficult to tie in GPL-licensed libraries. Is there any possibility of getting v3.31 released under a less restrictive license, maybe GPL or LGPL? |
philpem@0 | 13 | > > |
philpem@0 | 14 | |
philpem@0 | 15 | Sure, no problem. I usually release stuff under an Apache license nowadays, but feel free to pick any FOSS license. |
philpem@0 | 16 |